间歇性透析似乎对大多数急性肾衰竭病患有效
导读:
Intermittent Dialysis Seems Effective for Most Patients With Acute Renal Failure
By Marlene Busko
Medscape Medical News
August 8, 2006 – A large randomized trial reports that among critically ill patients with acute renal failure and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, 60-day survival was the same with intermittent or continuous dialysis.
"These data suggest that virtually all patients can be treated with intermittent dialysis, provided that strict guidelines to improve tolerance and metabolic control in the critically ill are implemented," the researchers, led by Christophe Vinsonneau, MD, from Cochin Port-Royal University Hospital, Paris, France, write.
Their report appears in the July 29 issue of The Lancet.
Continuous Dialysis is Controversial
In the past 20 years, continuous renal-replacement therapy has gained widespread acceptance for treating acute renal failure, especially in hemodynamically unstable patients, despite scarce or poor evidence that this treatment is better than intermittent dialysis, the authors write. Proponents of continuous therapy point to such advantages as increased time-averaged dose, more stable volume management, enhanced drug clearance, and possibly removal of higher-molecular-weight solutes such as cytokines. But previous trials that compared the 2 treatment modalities were retrospective or underpowered or had flaws such as imbalanced randomization or use of different membranes in the study groups, they write.
This study aimed to compare the effect of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration with intermittent hemodialysis on survival in patients with acute renal failure in a prospective, randomized trial. Dialysis was done using the same type of polyacrylonitrile membrane and bicarbonate-based dialysate in both groups. The primary outcome was 60-day survival, based on the lengthy hospital stay of these patients. Secondary outcomes included 28-day and 90-day survival.
From 1999 to 2003, the researchers prospectively randomized 360 patients in intensive care units in 21 hospitals in France to either continuous renal-replacement therapy or intermittent dialysis. Eligible patients had acute renal failure and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and required renal-replacement therapy. All centers had extensive experience with the 2 treatments. Investigators were provided with recommendations to achieve optimum metabolic control and hemodynamic stability. Treatment efficacy, as assessed by mean daily urea concentration, did not differ between the 2 groups. [page]
Similar 60-day survival
There was no significant difference between the groups in mean survival at 60 days or at any other time period. The investigators did notice an unexpected significant increase in survival over time in the intermittent-dialysis group but not in the continuous renal-replacement group. They concluded that, provided strict guidelines are implemented, intermittent dialysis seems suitable for almost all patients with acute renal failure.
Primary Study Outcome, Intermittent vs Continuous Dialysis
"Important" Study, More Research Needed
In an editorial accompanying the paper, John Kellum, MD, and Paul M. Palevsky, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, write that the findings by Vinsonneau and colleagues are "important." Study strengths include successful randomization and good adherence to protocol. Study weaknesses include the fact that that there might have been a bias to intermittent therapy, since "remarkably," only 3.3% of patients crossed from intermittent therapy to continuous therapy and, "surprisingly," 9.7% of patients crossed over in the opposite direction. A second difficulty is that the dose of dialysate was not specified in the protocol, they noted.
The editorialists add, "Nevertheless, Vinsonneau's study suggests that improved survival depends on how renal support is provided — as shown by the improvement over time in the intermittent-dialysis arm. More research is needed." They conclude: "Practical questions, such as whether a patient will do better with continuous therapy or intermittent therapy, remain unanswered. Unfortunately, protocols that force the use of one therapy or the other will not answer these questions."
Lancet. 2006;368:379-385, 344-345.
声明:该作品系作者结合法律法规,政府官网及互联网相关知识整合,如若内容错误请通过【投诉】功能联系删除.
相关知识推荐
间歇性精神病患者可否结婚《婚姻法》禁止结婚的疾病,国家立法机关一直没有任何进一步的规定或解释。相反,2001年6月国务院《母婴保健法实施办法》、2002年6月卫
与间歇性精神病人如何办理离婚最高人民法院《关于人民法院审理离婚案件如何认定夫妻感情确已破裂的若干具体意见》第3条规定:婚前隐瞒了精神病,婚后经治不愈,或者婚前知
《婚姻法》禁止结婚的疾病,国家立法机关一直没有任何进一步的规定或解释。相反,2001年6月国务院《母婴保健法实施办法》、2002年6月卫生部《婚前保健工作规范(
医疗事故赔偿纠纷的诉讼时效为三年,应当自受害人自权利人知道或者应当知道权利受到损害以及义务人之日起计算。我国《医疗事故处理条例》规定,发生医疗事故争议,当事人申
医疗事故中医院若不予赔偿的,当事人可以与医院协商解决,协商不成的,可以向人民法院提起诉讼。我国《医疗事故处理条例》规定,发生医疗事故的赔偿等民事责任争议,医患双
医疗纠纷中的当事人对人民法院作出的调解协议书反悔了的,无法自行撤销,必须经人民法院认定调解协议无效之后才可以重新达成新调解协议或者提起诉讼。我国《人民调解法》规
医疗机构不承担赔偿责任的情形包括有:患者或者其近亲属不配合医疗机构进行符合诊疗规范的诊疗的;医务人员在抢救生命垂危的患者等紧急情况下已经尽到合理诊疗义务的;限于
医院出伪证若是构成伪证罪的,会被处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役。情节严重的,处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑。伪证罪是指在刑事诉讼中,证人、鉴定人、记录人、翻译人对与案件